Visualizzazione post con etichetta Sweden. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta Sweden. Mostra tutti i post

giovedì 13 febbraio 2014

Decodificato un Codice Runico!


Mysterious code in Viking runes is cracked 


Why did Vikings sometimes use codes when they wrote in runes? 
Were the messages secret, or did they have other reasons for encrypting their runic texts?

 Researchers still don’t know for sure. 



A rather forthright message written in code: “Kiss me” is etched into a piece of bone found in Sigtuna in Sweden, dating to the 12th or 13th century. The code is in cipher runes, the most common code known from medieval Scandinavia. 
This variety is called ice runes [Credit: Jonas Nordby] 

But Runologist K. Jonas Nordby thinks he has made progress toward an answer. He has managed to crack a code called jötunvillur, which has baffled linguists and historians for years. His discovery can help researchers understand the purpose behind the mystery codes. “It’s like solving a riddle,” says Nordby. “After a while I started to see a pattern in what appeared to be meaningless combinations of runes,” he says.

 Codes in frequent use 

Ancient codes prompt associations with treasure hunts and conspiracies as depicted in The Da Vinci Code. But mysterious codes are not just the stuff of fiction and films. Real-life Vikings and medieval Norse people carved runic codes onto sticks of wood, stones and other objects. 




Two men, Sigurd and Lavrans, carved their names both in code and in standard runes on this stick, dated from the 13th century and found at the Bergen Wharf. This helped researcher Jonas Nordby crack the jötunvillur code [Credit: Aslak Liestøl/Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo] 

The codes are found in many forms and contexts. They have turned up all over Scandinavia, the British Isles and other places where runes were used. “It was very common to use codes. Much of the population mastered them. That’s why I think they were something people picked up at the same time they learned the runic alphabet. If you had learned to read and write, you had also learned codes,” says Nordby. The use of the code as a tool in learning is not as odd as it might seem. There were no rune schools then but knowledge of this alphabet could be transferred from generation to generation by linking it to games, poetry, drills and codes,  Nordby says. He is working on his doctorate in runes. Nordby is the first person to study all the findings of runic codes in Northern Europe, around 80 inscriptions. His PhD research has taken him to several countries to analyse runic inscriptions dating back as far as 800 AD. 

Imaginative use 

The use of runic codes was imaginative, but not mysterious enough for a Hollywood blockbuster. A rune stick from the Wharf in Bergen testifies to a mischievous use of runic writing. 


The lines in the beards of these men comprise a message, written in cipher runes [Credit: Aslak Liestøl/ Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo] 

“Many think the Vikings used cryptography to conceal secret messages. But I think the codes were used in play and for learning runes, rather than to communicate,” says Nordby. One of the reasons for his claim is that the jötunvillur code is written in a way that makes the interpretation ambiguous. 
“Jötunvillur can only be written, not read. It would be pointless to use it for messages,” says Nordby. This is why he has considered other possible uses for the code.  Nordby thinks the Vikings memorised rune names with the help of the jötunvillur code. All runes have names, and the jötunvillur code works by exchanging the rune sign with the last sound in the rune’s name. For example, the rune for the letter U is called “urr” so it is encoded with the rune for R. The problem is that many runes end in the same sound. This makes it hard to figure out which runic letter the code refers to. The rune codes were not just used for learning. Nordby thinks the use also indicates a whimsical use of runes in the Viking Era and the Middle Ages. “These runes were carved by the most rune-literate man west of the sea,” bragged the author of this text. The inscription is in cipher runes and in regular runes. It was found in a burial chamber from the early Stone Age that Scandinavians broke into in the 1100s on the Orkney Islands. 



“A typical bunch of male adolescents were fooling around and wrote tall tales about treasures and their own sexual prowess,” says Runologist Jonas Nordby [Credit: Bengt A. Lundberg/Riksantikvarieämbetet] 



“We have little reason to believe the runic codes were used to conceal sensitive information. People often wrote short, routine messages,” says Nordby. Coded declarations such as “Kiss me” demonstrate that the use of code was not limited to issues of political significance. Many of the messages in runic codes included a challenge to the reader to crack the code. The inscription “Interpret these runes” was common. “People challenged one another with codes. It was a kind of competition in the art of rune making. This testifies to a playfulness with writing that we don’t see today,” says Nordby. Nine of the 80 or so coded runic writings that Nordby has investigated are written in the jötunvillur code. The others are written in coded runes with the aid of the Caesar cipher, a system involving a shift to letters a few places away in the alphabet. This and another code have been understood by researchers for some time. 


The recipient of this small altar in ivory got a challenge written in runic code on the side of the altar: 'Pauline, my sister, interpret this'. Code is Cæsarchifferet, the system of the Roman emperor Caesar used to communicate with his generals [Credit: Jonas Nordby] 

Bragging about literacy and sex 

Being good at writing and breaking codes ensured a certain amount of status, and people bragged about their proficiencies. On the Orkney Islands, for instance, someone wrote in code:  “These runes were carved by the most rune-literate man west of the sea”. Runic codes drawn as figures also show that Vikings played with writing. A window of understanding Henrik Williams, a professor at Uppsala University’s Department of Scandinavian Languages and a Swedish expert on runes, says that Nordby’s discovery is important. 


Digit code is a system that divides the runic alphabet in three parts. 
Number of lines on the left side of the sign showing which part of the runic alphabet they should look for it in.  
The bars on the right tells the exact position within one of the three parts
 [Credit: Jonas Nordby] 

“Above all, it helps us understand that there were more codes than we were aware of. Each runic inscription we interpret raises our hopes of soon being able to read more. This is pure detective work and each new method improves our chances,” says Williams. He agrees that the codes could have been used as a tool for learning runes. But he is uncertain how big a role this would have played in the learning process. In any case, Williams thinks the codes were used for much more than communication. “They challenged the reader, demonstrated skills, and testify to a joy in reading and writing.” What can the codes say about society at the time they were used? “They tell us much about people’s playfulness and innovation. We come closer to the thoughts of people living at the time through understanding their codes. Nordby has made an important discovery by breaking the code,” says Williams. “But personally I think jötunvillur is an idiotic code, because whoever made it chose a system that is so hard to interpret. It’s irritating not being able to read it.” 

Author: Ida Kvittingen.

 | Source: Science Nordic [February 05, 2014]

Read more at: http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.it/2014/02/mysterious-code-in-viking-runes-is.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+TheArchaeologyNewsNetwork+(The+Archaeology+News+Network)#.Uvz1bovolib
Follow us: @ArchaeoNewsNet on Twitter | groups/thearchaeologynewsnetwork/ on Facebook

lunedì 25 marzo 2013

Navi di Pietra del Baltico

Stone ships 

show signs of maritime network in Baltic Sea region 

3,000 years ago


In the middle of the Bronze Age, around 1000 BC, the amount of metal objects increased dramatically in the Baltic Sea region. 
Around the same time, a new type of stone monument, arranged in the form of ships, started to appear along the coasts. New research from the University of Gothenburg, Sweden shows that the stone ships were built by maritime groups.

Stone ships show signs of maritime network in Baltic Sea region 3,000 years ago
Stone ship in Askeberga, Västergötland, Sweden [Credit: University of Gothenburg]

The maritime groups were part of a network that extended across large parts of northern Europe. The network was maintained largely because of the strong dependence on bronze.

Archaeologists have long assumed that bronze was imported to Scandinavia from the south, and recent analyses have been able to confirm this notion. The distribution of bronze objects has been discussed frequently, with most analyses focusing on the links in the networks. The people behind the networks, however, are only rarely addressed, not to mention their meeting places.

‘One reason why the meeting places of the Bronze Age are not discussed very often is that we haven’t been able to find them. This is in strong contrast to the trading places of the Viking Age, which have been easy to locate as they left behind such rich archaeological material,’ says the author of the thesis Joakim Wehlin from the University of Gothenburg and Gotland University.

In his thesis, Wehlin has analysed the archaeological material from the Bronze Age stone ships and their placement in the landscape. The stone ships can be found across the entire Baltic Sea region and especially on the larger islands, with a significant cluster on the Swedish island of Gotland. The ships have long been thought to have served as graves for one or several individuals, and have for this reason often been viewed as death ships intended to take the deceased to the afterlife.



‘My study shows a different picture. It seems like the whole body was typically not buried in the ship, and some stone ships don’t even have graves in them. Instead, they sometimes show remains of other types of activities. So with the absence of the dead, the traces of the survivors tend to appear.’

One of Wehlin’s conclusions is that the stone ships and the activities that took place there point to people who were strongly focused on maritime practice. Details in the ships indicate that they were built to represent real ships. Wehlin says that the stone ships give clues about the ship-building techniques of the time and therefore about the ships that sailed on the Baltic Sea during the Bronze Age.

By studying the landscape, Wehlin has managed to locate a number of meeting places, or early ports.

‘These consist of areas that resemble hill forts and are located near easily accessible points in the landscape – that is, near well-known waterways leading inland. While these areas have previously been thought to be much younger, recent age determinations have dated them to the Bronze Age.’

The thesis offers a very extensive account of the stone ships. It also suggests that the importance of the Baltic Sea during the Scandinavian Bronze Age, not least as a waterway, has been underestimated in previous research.

Source: University of Gothenburg [March 21, 2013]